| dc.contributor.author | Barla, P. | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Belcour, L. | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Pacanowski, R. | en_US |
| dc.contributor.editor | Reinhard Klein and Holly Rushmeier | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2015-07-31T07:40:43Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2015-07-31T07:40:43Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2015 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 978-3-905674-83-5 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2309-5059 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.2312/mam.20151197 | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | In this paper, we extend the work of Neumann et al. [NNSK99] and Stark et al. [SAS05] to a pair of 4D BRDF parameterizations with explicit changes of variables. We detail their mathematical properties and relationships to the commonly-used halfway/difference parametrization, and discuss their benefits and drawbacks using a few analytical test functions and measured BRDFs. Our preliminary study suggests that the alternative parametrization inspired by Stark et al. [SAS05] is superior, and should thus be considered in future work involving BRDFs. | en_US |
| dc.publisher | The Eurographics Association | en_US |
| dc.title | In Praise of an Alternative BRDF Parametrization | en_US |
| dc.description.seriesinformation | Workshop on Material Appearance Modeling | en_US |
| dc.description.sectionheaders | Papers | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.2312/mam.20151197 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.pages | 9-13 | en_US |
