dc.contributor.author | Baer, Alexandra | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Huebler, Antje | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Saalfeld, Patrick | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Cunningham, Douglas | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Preim, Bernhard | en_US |
dc.contributor.editor | Ivan Viola and Katja Buehler and Timo Ropinski | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-12-16T07:37:21Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-12-16T07:37:21Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | en_US |
dc.identifier.isbn | 978-3-905674-62-0 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 2070-5778 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.2312/vcbm.20141190 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10.2312/vcbm.20141190.181-190 | |
dc.description.abstract | This paper presents the design and execution of a comparative experimental between-participant study with 42 participants. We investigated depth perception comparing a 2D display with a glasses-free 3D autostereoscopic display in detail and conducted a follow-up study with the new 3D zSpace technology including a stylus as input device. This work comprises the design of a tympanoplastic training scenario used as the study's "real world task". Participants had to position a prosthesis implant to reconstruct the ossicular chain and thus a patient's hearing ability. The study revealed an overwhelming support of the 3D autostereoscopic display compared to a 2D display regarding depth judgment, task completion time and the number of required scene and prosthesis interactions. | en_US |
dc.publisher | The Eurographics Association | en_US |
dc.subject | B.4.2 [Input/Output and Data Communications] | en_US |
dc.subject | Input/Output Devices | en_US |
dc.subject | Image Display G.3 [Probability and Statistics] | en_US |
dc.subject | Experimental Design | en_US |
dc.title | A Comparative User Study of a 2D and an Autostereoscopic 3D Display for a Tympanoplastic Surgery | en_US |
dc.description.seriesinformation | Eurographics Workshop on Visual Computing for Biology and Medicine | en_US |