Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRuchikachorn, Puripanten_US
dc.contributor.authorRattanawicha, Pimmaneeen_US
dc.contributor.editorAnna Puig and Renata Raidouen_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-06-02T17:55:43Z
dc.date.available2018-06-02T17:55:43Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.isbn978-3-03868-065-9
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.2312/eurp.20181119
dc.identifier.urihttps://diglib.eg.org:443/handle/10.2312/eurp20181119
dc.description.abstractSparklines are placed in documents but their usability is rarely evaluated in their immediate context of paragraphs of text. We conducted an eye-tracking study to measure readability and understandability of four different conditions: two different sparkline chart types (bar and line charts) and two text languages (native and non-native languages). We found out that most participants out of 296 in total were not distracted by sparklines. Only 3.19% of the average reading time was spent looking at sparklines. There was no correlation between dwell time and data understanding, measured in a post-experiment quiz. The chart types did not have a significant effect on sparkline attention. However, compared with native textual context, sparklines in non-native text were more noticeable. The results of this study can be useful for future sparkline usage consideration.en_US
dc.publisherThe Eurographics Associationen_US
dc.subjectHuman
dc.subjectcentered computing
dc.subjectEmpirical studies in visualization
dc.subjectVisualization design and evaluation methods
dc.titleAn Eye-Tracking Study on Sparklines within Textual Contexten_US
dc.description.seriesinformationEuroVis 2018 - Posters
dc.description.sectionheadersPosters
dc.identifier.doi10.2312/eurp.20181119
dc.identifier.pages17-19


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record