dc.contributor.author | Ruchikachorn, Puripant | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Rattanawicha, Pimmanee | en_US |
dc.contributor.editor | Anna Puig and Renata Raidou | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-06-02T17:55:43Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-06-02T17:55:43Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.identifier.isbn | 978-3-03868-065-9 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.2312/eurp.20181119 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://diglib.eg.org:443/handle/10.2312/eurp20181119 | |
dc.description.abstract | Sparklines are placed in documents but their usability is rarely evaluated in their immediate context of paragraphs of text. We conducted an eye-tracking study to measure readability and understandability of four different conditions: two different sparkline chart types (bar and line charts) and two text languages (native and non-native languages). We found out that most participants out of 296 in total were not distracted by sparklines. Only 3.19% of the average reading time was spent looking at sparklines. There was no correlation between dwell time and data understanding, measured in a post-experiment quiz. The chart types did not have a significant effect on sparkline attention. However, compared with native textual context, sparklines in non-native text were more noticeable. The results of this study can be useful for future sparkline usage consideration. | en_US |
dc.publisher | The Eurographics Association | en_US |
dc.subject | Human | |
dc.subject | centered computing | |
dc.subject | Empirical studies in visualization | |
dc.subject | Visualization design and evaluation methods | |
dc.title | An Eye-Tracking Study on Sparklines within Textual Context | en_US |
dc.description.seriesinformation | EuroVis 2018 - Posters | |
dc.description.sectionheaders | Posters | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.2312/eurp.20181119 | |
dc.identifier.pages | 17-19 | |