Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKriglstein, Simoneen_US
dc.contributor.authorPohl, Margiten_US
dc.contributor.editorW. Aigner and P. Rosenthal and C. Scheideggeren_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-24T19:39:51Z
dc.date.available2015-05-24T19:39:51Z
dc.date.issued2015en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.2312/eurorv3.20151146en_US
dc.description.abstractConducting and reporting evaluation studies has become more and more popular over the last few years in the information visualization community. A big challenge is to describe such studies in a way such that the investigations are repeatable and comparable with other studies. This not only includes the description of methodology, tasks, and procedure of the study but also information about the participants - including the reasons for their selection - to make the work reproducible and to assess its validity. In this paper we give a short overview about our research that we conducted in the past to show in which context and situations which types of test persons (e.g., students or experts) were considered.en_US
dc.publisherThe Eurographics Associationen_US
dc.subjectH 5.2. [Information Interfaces and Presentation(e.g.en_US
dc.subjectHCI) ]en_US
dc.subjectUser Interfacesen_US
dc.subjectEvaluation/Methodologyen_US
dc.titleChoosing the Right Sample? Experiences of Selecting Participants for Visualization Evaluationen_US
dc.description.seriesinformationEuroVis Workshop on Reproducibility, Verification, and Validation in Visualization (EuroRV3)en_US
dc.description.sectionheadersReproducibility in Information Visualizationen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.2312/eurorv3.20151146en_US
dc.identifier.pages23-25en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record