| dc.contributor.author | Jones, Peter R. | en_US |
| dc.contributor.editor | K. BO and H.A. TUCKER | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2015-09-29T08:29:16Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2015-09-29T08:29:16Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 1984 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1017-4656 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.2312/eg.19841029 | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | This paper justifies the question posed in its title, by pointing out some of the reasons which make the use of a "quasi" automatic system necessary, when customized performances of the intelligence built in a business graphics package are desired. The implementation case reports on experience gained from coding a Pascal package for a 16-bit Zilog 8000 machine, hosting Olivetti's proprietary Multifunctional Operating System (MOS). | en_US |
| dc.publisher | The Eurographics Association | en_US |
| dc.title | HOW INTELLIGENT CAN BUSINESS GRAPHICS SOFTWARE BE? | en_US |
| dc.description.seriesinformation | Eurographics Conference Proceedings | en_US |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.2312/eg.19841029 | en_US |
