| dc.contributor.author | Leeuw, Wim de | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Liere, Robert van | en_US |
| dc.contributor.editor | G.-P. Bonneau and S. Hahmann and C. D. Hansen | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2014-01-30T07:36:33Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2014-01-30T07:36:33Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2003 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.isbn | 3-905673-01-0 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1727-5296 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.2312/VisSym/VisSym03/129-134 | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | In this case study, we compare two methods for filtering external motion in time dependent volume data sets acquired from confocal microscopy. The pros and cons of a landmark based and a voxel based method are discussed. We show that filtering external motion is an essential first step for the visualization of confocal data. | en_US |
| dc.publisher | The Eurographics Association | en_US |
| dc.title | Case Study: Comparing Two Methods for Filtering External Motion in 4D Confocal Microscopy Data | en_US |
| dc.description.seriesinformation | Eurographics / IEEE VGTC Symposium on Visualization | en_US |
