Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSutton, Philip M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHansen, Charles D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorShen, Han-Weien_US
dc.contributor.authorSchikore, Danen_US
dc.contributor.editorW. de Leeuw and R. van Liereen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-30T06:41:40Z
dc.date.available2014-01-30T06:41:40Z
dc.date.issued2000en_US
dc.identifier.isbn3211835156en_US
dc.identifier.issn1727-5296en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.2312/VisSym/VisSym00/259-268en_US
dc.description.abstractIsosurface extraction is an important and useful visualization method. Over the past ten years, the field has seen numerous isosurface techniques published, leaving the user in a quandary about which one should be used. Some papers have published complexity analysis of the techniques, yet empirical evidence comparing different methods is lacking. This case study presents a comparative study of several representative isosurface extraction algorithms. It reports and analyzes empirical measurements of execution times and memory behavior for each algorithm. The results show that asymptotically optimal techniques may not be the best choice when implemented on modern computer architectures.en_US
dc.publisherThe Eurographics Associationen_US
dc.titleA Case Study of Isosurface Extraction Algorithm Performanceen_US
dc.description.seriesinformationJoint Eurographics - IEEE TCVG Symposium on Visualizationen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record