Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSchaefer, Scotten_US
dc.contributor.authorLevin, Daviden_US
dc.contributor.authorGoldman, Ronen_US
dc.contributor.editorMathieu Desbrun and Helmut Pottmannen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-29T09:31:11Z
dc.date.available2014-01-29T09:31:11Z
dc.date.issued2005en_US
dc.identifier.isbn3-905673-24-Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn1727-8384en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.2312/SGP/SGP05/171-180en_US
dc.description.abstractSubdivision schemes generate self-similar curves and surfaces. Therefore there is a close connection between curves and surfaces generated by subdivision algorithms and self-similar fractals generated by Iterated Function Systems (IFS). We demonstrate that this connection between subdivision schemes and fractals is even deeper by showing that curves and surfaces generated by subdivision are also attractors, fixed points of IFS's. To illustrate this fractal nature of subdivision, we derive the associated IFS for many different subdivision curves and surfaces without extraordinary vertices, including B-splines, piecewise Bezier, interpolatory four-point subdivision, bicubic subdivision, three-direction quartic box-spline subdivision and Kobbelt's p3-subdivision surfaces. Conversely, we shall show how to build subdivision schemes to generate traditional fractals such as the Sierpinski gasket and the Koch curve, and we demonstrate as well how to control the shape of these fractals by adjusting their control points.en_US
dc.publisherThe Eurographics Associationen_US
dc.subjectCategories and Subject Descriptors (according to ACM CCS): I.3.7 [Computer Graphics]: Fractalsen_US
dc.titleSubdivision Schemes and Attractorsen_US
dc.description.seriesinformationEurographics Symposium on Geometry Processing 2005en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record