Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLidal, E. M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPatel, D.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBendiksen, M.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLangeland, T.en_US
dc.contributor.authorViola, I.en_US
dc.contributor.editorO. Kolditz and K. Rink and G. Scheuermannen_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-24T10:53:44Z
dc.date.available2014-01-24T10:53:44Z
dc.date.issued2013en_US
dc.identifier.isbn978-3-905674-54-5en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.2312/PE.EnvirVis.EnvirVis13.031-035en_US
dc.description.abstractWe present and compare two different approaches for performing rapid 3D geological modeling. The ad-hoc approach is based on a composition of many specialized modeling functions, while the generic approach provides one powerful, generic modeling function. Our experiences after developing these two approaches are that the solution space of 3D geological modeling is more extensive than we initially expected and most likely larger than for other modeling domains such as architecture. Further, more research is needed to investigate whether it is possible to find one well defined toolset of sketching metaphors that is able to cover all of geological modeling.en_US
dc.publisherThe Eurographics Associationen_US
dc.titleRapid Sketch-based 3D Modeling of Geologyen_US
dc.description.seriesinformationWorkshop on Visualisation in Environmental Sciences (EnvirVis)en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record