dc.contributor.author | Brodlie, K.W. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Pfaff, G.E. | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-07-30T15:18:08Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-07-30T15:18:08Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1982 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1467-8659 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8659.1982.tb00029.x | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | The outcome of the Miltenberg meeting shows that a practical method of certification by testing (falsification) can be developed, given a reasonable amount of time and effort. It is based on semiautomatic comparison at the "device" interface of a candidate implementation against a so-called reference implementation. A prerequisite for this method is the availability of a number of isolated simple basic facilities of the candidate implementation which have been verified by pictorial testing and by testing through operator actions.To permit semi-automatic comparison, a format for describing graphical output and input items and their associated properties must be defined. The workshop produced an outline design for such a format, which can be applied at any interface within GKS at which testing might be desirable. | en_US |
dc.publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd and the Eurographics Association | en_US |
dc.title | Report on the EEC Workshop on Graphics Certification Defining a Device Interface for Certification Miltenberg/Darmstadt, FRG25-28 April 1982 | en_US |
dc.description.seriesinformation | Computer Graphics Forum | en_US |
dc.description.volume | 1 | en_US |
dc.description.number | 3 | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/j.1467-8659.1982.tb00029.x | en_US |
dc.identifier.pages | 88-90 | en_US |