Classification in Cryo-Electron Tomograms
View/ Open
Date
2019Author
Gubins, Ilja
Schot, Gijs van der
Veltkamp, Remco C.
Förster, Friedrich
Du, Xuefeng
Zeng, Xiangrui
Zhu, Zhenxi
Chang, Lufan
Xu, Min
Moebel, Emmanuel
Martinez-Sanchez, Antonio
Kervrann, Charles
Lai, Tuan M.
Han, Xusi
Terashi, Genki
Kihara, Daisuke
Himes, Benjamin A.
Wan, Xiaohua
Zhang, Jingrong
Gao, Shan
Hao, Yu
Lv, Zhilong
Wan, Xiaohua
Yang, Zhidong
Ding, Zijun
Cui, Xuefeng
Zhang, Fa
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Different imaging techniques allow us to study the organization of life at different scales. Cryo-electron tomography (cryo-ET) has the ability to three-dimensionally visualize the cellular architecture as well as the structural details of macro-molecular assemblies under near-native conditions. Due to beam sensitivity of biological samples, an inidividual tomogram has a maximal resolution of 5 nanometers. By averaging volumes, each depicting copies of the same type of a molecule, resolutions beyond 4 Å have been achieved. Key in this process is the ability to localize and classify the components of interest, which is challenging due to the low signal-to-noise ratio. Innovation in computational methods remains key to mine biological information from the tomograms. To promote such innovation, we organize this SHREC track and provide a simulated dataset with the goal of establishing a benchmark in localization and classification of biological particles in cryo-electron tomograms. The publicly available dataset contains ten reconstructed tomograms obtained from a simulated cell-like volume. Each volume contains twelve different types of proteins, varying in size and structure. Participants had access to 9 out of 10 of the cell-like ground-truth volumes for learning-based methods, and had to predict protein class and location in the test tomogram. Five groups submitted eight sets of results, using seven different methods. While our sample size gives only an anecdotal overview of current approaches in cryo-ET classification, we believe it shows trends and highlights interesting future work areas. The results show that learning-based approaches is the current trend in cryo-ET classification research and specifically end-to-end 3D learning-based approaches achieve the best performance.
BibTeX
@inproceedings {10.2312:3dor.20191061,
booktitle = {Eurographics Workshop on 3D Object Retrieval},
editor = {Biasotti, Silvia and Lavoué, Guillaume and Veltkamp, Remco},
title = {{Classification in Cryo-Electron Tomograms}},
author = {Gubins, Ilja and Schot, Gijs van der and Veltkamp, Remco C. and Förster, Friedrich and Du, Xuefeng and Zeng, Xiangrui and Zhu, Zhenxi and Chang, Lufan and Xu, Min and Moebel, Emmanuel and Martinez-Sanchez, Antonio and Kervrann, Charles and Lai, Tuan M. and Han, Xusi and Terashi, Genki and Kihara, Daisuke and Himes, Benjamin A. and Wan, Xiaohua and Zhang, Jingrong and Gao, Shan and Hao, Yu and Lv, Zhilong and Wan, Xiaohua and Yang, Zhidong and Ding, Zijun and Cui, Xuefeng and Zhang, Fa},
year = {2019},
publisher = {The Eurographics Association},
ISSN = {1997-0471},
ISBN = {978-3-03868-077-2},
DOI = {10.2312/3dor.20191061}
}
booktitle = {Eurographics Workshop on 3D Object Retrieval},
editor = {Biasotti, Silvia and Lavoué, Guillaume and Veltkamp, Remco},
title = {{Classification in Cryo-Electron Tomograms}},
author = {Gubins, Ilja and Schot, Gijs van der and Veltkamp, Remco C. and Förster, Friedrich and Du, Xuefeng and Zeng, Xiangrui and Zhu, Zhenxi and Chang, Lufan and Xu, Min and Moebel, Emmanuel and Martinez-Sanchez, Antonio and Kervrann, Charles and Lai, Tuan M. and Han, Xusi and Terashi, Genki and Kihara, Daisuke and Himes, Benjamin A. and Wan, Xiaohua and Zhang, Jingrong and Gao, Shan and Hao, Yu and Lv, Zhilong and Wan, Xiaohua and Yang, Zhidong and Ding, Zijun and Cui, Xuefeng and Zhang, Fa},
year = {2019},
publisher = {The Eurographics Association},
ISSN = {1997-0471},
ISBN = {978-3-03868-077-2},
DOI = {10.2312/3dor.20191061}
}