dc.contributor.author | Pickup, David | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Sun, Xianfang | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Rosin, Paul L. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Martin, Ralph R. | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Cheng, Zhiquan | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Nie, Sipin | en_US |
dc.contributor.author | Jin, Longcun | en_US |
dc.contributor.editor | I. Pratikakis and M. Spagnuolo and T. Theoharis and L. Van Gool and R. Veltkamp | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-04-27T11:03:39Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-04-27T11:03:39Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://dx.doi.org/10.2312/3dor.20151063 | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | We present a new benchmark for testing algorithms that create canonical forms for use in non-rigid 3D shape retrieval. We have combined two existing datasets to create a varied collection of models for testing. Canonical forms attempt to factor out a shape's pose, giving a pose-neutral shape. This opens up the possibility of using methods originally designed for rigid retrieval for the task of non-rigid shape retrieval. We demonstrate the benchmark by using it to compare the performance of nine canonical form methods, using three different retrieval algorithms. | en_US |
dc.publisher | The Eurographics Association | en_US |
dc.title | Canonical Forms for Non-Rigid 3D Shape Retrieval | en_US |
dc.description.seriesinformation | Eurographics Workshop on 3D Object Retrieval | en_US |
dc.description.sectionheaders | SHREC'15 Tracks | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.2312/3dor.20151063 | en_US |
dc.identifier.pages | 99-106 | en_US |