Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAigner, W.en_US
dc.contributor.authorKainz, C.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMa, R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMiksch, S.en_US
dc.contributor.editorEduard Groeller and Holly Rushmeieren_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-02-27T10:19:13Z
dc.date.available2015-02-27T10:19:13Z
dc.date.issued2011en_US
dc.identifier.issn1467-8659en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8659.2010.01845.xen_US
dc.description.abstractLine plots are very well suited for visually representing time-series. However, several difficulties arise when multivariate heterogeneous time-series data is displayed and compared visually. Especially, if the developments and trends of time-series of different units or value ranges need to be compared, a straightforward overlay could be visually misleading. To mitigate this, visualization pioneer Jacques Bertin presented a method called indexing that transforms data into comparable units for visual representation. In this paper, we want to provide empirical evidence for this method and present a comparative study of the three visual comparison methods linear scale with juxtaposition, log scale with superimposition and indexing. Although for task completion times, indexing only shows slight advantages, the results support the assumption that the indexing method enables the user to perform comparison tasks with a significantly lower error rate. Furthermore, a post-test questionnaire showed that the majority of the participants favour the indexing method over the two other comparison methods.en_US
dc.publisherThe Eurographics Association and Blackwell Publishing Ltd.en_US
dc.titleBertin was Right: An Empirical Evaluation of Indexing to Compare Multivariate Time-Series Data Using Line Plotsen_US
dc.description.seriesinformationComputer Graphics Forumen_US
dc.description.volume30
dc.description.number1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record