Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBukenberger, Dennis R.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTarini, Marcoen_US
dc.contributor.authorLensch, Hendrik P. A.en_US
dc.contributor.editorHauser, Helwig and Alliez, Pierreen_US
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-25T12:31:00Z
dc.date.available2022-03-25T12:31:00Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn1467-8659
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1111/cgf.14393
dc.identifier.urihttps://diglib.eg.org:443/handle/10.1111/cgf14393
dc.description.abstractVolumetric polyhedral meshes are required in many applications, especially for solving partial differential equations on finite element simulations. Still, their construction bears several additional challenges compared to boundary‐based representations. Tetrahedral meshes and (pure) hex‐meshes are two popular formats in scenarios like CAD applications, offering opposite advantages and disadvantages. Hex‐meshes are more intricate to construct due to the global structure of the meshing, but feature much better regularity, alignment, are more expressive, and offer the same simulation accuracy with fewer elements. Hex‐dominant meshes, where most but not all cell elements have a hexahedral structure, constitute an attractive compromise, potentially unlocking benefits from both structures, but their generality makes their employment in downstream applications difficult. In this work, we introduce a strict subset of general hex‐dominant meshes, which we term ‘at‐most‐hexa meshes’, in which most cells are still hexahedral, but no cell has more than six boundary faces, and no face has more than four sides. We exemplify the ease of construction of at‐most‐hexa meshes by proposing a frugal and straightforward method to generate high‐quality meshes of this kind, starting directly from hulls or point clouds, for example, from a 3D scan. In contrast to existing methods for (pure) hexahedral meshing, ours does not require an intermediate parameterization of other costly pre‐computations and can start directly from surfaces or samples. We leverage a Lloyd relaxation process to exploit the synergistic effects of aligning an orientation field in a modified 3D Voronoi diagram using the norm for cubical cells. The extracted geometry incorporates regularity as well as feature alignment, following sharp edges and curved boundary surfaces. We introduce specialized operations on the three‐dimensional graph structure to enforce consistency during the relaxation. The resulting algorithm allows for an efficient evaluation with parallel algorithms on GPU hardware and completes even large reconstructions within minutes.en_US
dc.publisher© 2022 Eurographics ‐ The European Association for Computer Graphics and John Wiley & Sons Ltden_US
dc.subjectcomputational geometry
dc.subjectmodelling
dc.subjectgeometric modelling
dc.subjectmesh generation
dc.titleAt‐Most‐Hexa Meshesen_US
dc.description.seriesinformationComputer Graphics Forum
dc.description.sectionheadersArticles
dc.description.volume41
dc.description.number1
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/cgf.14393
dc.identifier.pages7-28


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record