Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSaket, Bahadoren_US
dc.contributor.authorScheidegger, Carlosen_US
dc.contributor.authorKobourov, Stephenen_US
dc.contributor.editorKwan-Liu Ma and Giuseppe Santucci and Jarke van Wijken_US
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-09T09:32:34Z
dc.date.available2016-06-09T09:32:34Z
dc.date.issued2016en_US
dc.identifier.issn1467-8659en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cgf.12880en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://diglib.eg.org:443/handle/10
dc.description.abstractWhile evaluation studies in visualization often involve traditional performance measurements, there has been a concerted effort to move beyond time and accuracy. Of these alternative aspects, memorability and recall of visualizations have been recently considered, but other aspects such as enjoyment and engagement are not as well explored. We study the enjoyment of two different visualization methods through a user study. In particular, we describe the results of a three-phase experiment comparing the enjoyment of two different visualizations of the same relational data: node-link and node-link-group visualizations. The results indicate that the participants in this study found node-link-group visualizations more enjoyable than node-link visualizations.en_US
dc.publisherThe Eurographics Association and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.en_US
dc.titleComparing Node-Link and Node-Link-Group Visualizations From An Enjoyment Perspectiveen_US
dc.description.seriesinformationComputer Graphics Forumen_US
dc.description.sectionheadersNetworks and Graphs 1en_US
dc.description.volume35en_US
dc.description.number3en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/cgf.12880en_US
dc.identifier.pages041-050en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record