Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVehlow, Corinnaen_US
dc.contributor.authorBeck, Fabianen_US
dc.contributor.authorWeiskopf, Danielen_US
dc.contributor.editorChen, Min and Zhang, Hao (Richard)en_US
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-10T07:36:22Z
dc.date.available2018-01-10T07:36:22Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn1467-8659
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cgf.12872
dc.identifier.urihttps://diglib.eg.org:443/handle/10.1111/cgf12872
dc.description.abstractGraph visualizations encode relationships between objects. Abstracting the objects into group structures provides an overview of the data. Groups can be disjoint or overlapping, and might be organized hierarchically. However, the underlying graph still needs to be represented for analyzing the data in more depth. This work surveys research in visualizing group structures as part of graph diagrams. A particular focus is the explicit visual encoding of groups, rather than only using graph layout to indicate groups implicitly. We introduce a taxonomy of visualization techniques structuring the field into four main categories: visual node attributes vary properties of the node representation to encode the grouping, juxtaposed approaches use two separate visualizations, superimposed techniques work with two aligned visual layers, and embedded visualizations tightly integrate group and graph representation. The derived taxonomies for group structure and visualization types are also applied to group visualizations of edges. We survey group‐only, group–node, group–edge and group–network tasks that are described in the literature as use cases of group visualizations. We discuss results from evaluations of existing visualization techniques as well as main areas of application. Finally, we report future challenges based on interviews we conducted with leading researchers of the field.Graph visualizations encode relationships between objects. Abstracting the objects into group structures provides an overview of the data. Groups can be disjoint or overlapping, and might be organized hierarchically. However, the underlying graph still needs to be represented for analyzing the data in more depth. This work surveys research in visualizing group structures as part of graph diagrams. A particular focus is the explicit visual encoding of groups, rather than only using graph layout to indicate groups implicitly. We introduce a taxonomy of visualization techniques structuring the field into four main categories: visual node attributes vary properties of the node representation to encode the grouping, juxtaposed approaches use two separate visualizations, superimposed techniques work with two aligned visual layers, and embedded visualizations tightly integrate group and graph representation.en_US
dc.publisher© 2017 The Eurographics Association and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.en_US
dc.subjectgraph visualization
dc.subjectgroup visualization
dc.subjectliterature survey
dc.subjectCategories and Subject Descriptors (according to ACM CCS): H.5.2 [Information Interfaces and Presentation]: User Interfaces—Graphical user interfaces (GUI)
dc.titleVisualizing Group Structures in Graphs: A Surveyen_US
dc.description.seriesinformationComputer Graphics Forum
dc.description.sectionheadersArticles
dc.description.volume36
dc.description.number6
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/cgf.12872
dc.identifier.pages201-225
dc.description.documenttypestar


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record